Carrie Willard

putting the "her" back in motherhood

  • About Carrie
    • Fine Print
  • New? Start here
  • Home & Family
    • Homeschool
    • Mothering
    • Homemaking
  • Well-being
    • Books & Read-Alouds
    • Beauty
    • Food
    • Health
  • Your Money
    • Earning & Investing
    • Blogging & Writing
    • Frugality
  • Your Time
    • Habits & Goals
  • Recommended

August 22, 2011 by Carrie

Size matters: eat on a small plate

I’ve lost a few pounds recently without trying. I couldn’t figure out exactly why my clothes were getting baggy all of a sudden.

It’s not because I’m exercising more.

In fact, I’ve exercised LESS in the last few weeks due to feelings of persistent exhaustion, as I so whiningly eloquently expressed in this post.

I’m not sure what I weigh now, but I’m wearing clothes I wore before baby’s arrival. Yay!

I tried weighing myself but the scale read 60 pounds. I’m pretty sure that’s not right. Evidently, a cheap scale can’t handle a 5 year old jumping up and down on it repeatedly. Who knew?

This morning, when hubby brought me a piece of banana bread on a tiny plate, it hit me:

I’ve been eating on a small plate for a few weeks now, and slowly but surely it led to weight loss.

Here’s what my plate looks like:

eat on a small plate
Note: I don’t normally floss during my meals. I just grabbed the closest thing I could find to demonstrate the size of the plate. Someone is in trouble for leaving dental floss on the kitchen table, by the way. As soon as I figure out who done it.

I remembered reading in the book Mindless Eating: Why We Eat More Than We Think, that the the average size of a dinner plate in the 1950s was 9 inches across. By the 80’s our plates had grown to 11 inches and now the average size of a dinner plate is 13 inches.

The plate I’ve been eating every meal on is about the size of a saucer. If I’m still hungry after eating everything on my plate, I get more food.

I don’t go around hungry.

I would never do that. It’s not smart for a busy mom to starve herself, especially when she’s nursing.

My sneaky little habit had caught up with me!

Turns out, when it comes to your plate, size matters.

Another thing I learned from the above mentioned book is that much of our hunger is all in our heads. One of the studies that stuck out to me was one in which the participants ate soup from bowls that were rigged so that they automatically kept refilling as they emptied, unbeknownst to the eaters.

Guess what happened?

Yep. They ate WAY MUCH MORE SOUP than the ones with normal bowls. Yet none of them reported being “stufffed”. Quite the contrary. They felt just as sated as the ones who ate 1/4 of the calories!

I hate exercise, but I force myself to do it. But eating on a small plate? Pretty much effortless!

 

Share
Pin
Tweet
0 Shares

Filed Under: Health

About Carrie

Carrie is a homeschooling mom of 7 and the author of this blog. More about her here.

❮❮ Previous Post
Next Post ❯ ❯

Comments

  1. Candi @ Family Stamping and FOOD! says

    August 23, 2011 at 2:02 pm

    I’ve been doing this too. Since about February when I really started counting calories. It’s amazing how fast you feel full! Good for you! But I don’t think you need to lose any weight!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Never Miss a Post!

Recent Posts

  • My solution (for now) to avoiding food waste
  • Frugal Wins, September Edition
  • The benefits of financial trauma
  • How to stop emotional spending
  • Notes from my first FinCon
  • On Learning to Linger
  • Frugal Wins, July edition
  • Uber Frugal Month: join us?
  • Thankful Thursday, job edition
  • Recent frugal wins (and fails)

Like this blog?

Buy me a matcha!

Like this?

Buy me a matcha!

Pretty Chic Theme By: Pretty Darn Cute Design